The Negative Microwave Idea:
|
A
microwave oven is a great invention that heats your food in just
seconds. I would really like to se a microwave cooler. E.g. it would be
great to put soup, food or other stuff that are to hot to eat/drink
into a "microcooler" and get it colder in just seconds. Very handy if
you like me usualy don't make some food unless you are really hungry.
The problem with most food is that it's simply to hot to eat right away
and therefore it would be nice to cool it down to a more pleasant
temperature :)
|
The Anti-Psycological
Pricing Idea:
|
Most
places when you
buy stuff the prices are psycological correct like "only" $8.99 or
something like that. I can't help thinking that since "everyone" is
using this pricing scheme a shop who said for example only $9 would
make more money even if a few moreons didn't see through that pricing
scam.
What I think is that even if the price is higher it seems smaller
because people are so used to that $1.99 or for example $4.98 stuff
that the simple $9 seems a lot less for those who don't think much.
Also the cashier would have to do much less work since it will be
easier to return change. Overall a shop who used such a pricing scheme
would probably make more money since the cashier would work faster (in
a perfect world), and thus getting rid of a long queue faster than
another who needed to return more complex change to the customer. Let's
say this shop earns some money on this since the queue is moving faster
and the customers buy more stuff since it seems cheaper and it's also
much easier to keep track of how much money you actually spent. What
would happen? the shop could ofcourse maybe reduce the overall cost of
a item and maybe more would go to that shop instead of other shops and
the cycle may repeat :) |
Shitting Experience
(Norwegian text):
|
Når
man er på driter'n som vi sier på godt norsk
så er
det ganske utrolig hvor like vi er spraybokser. Min favoritt er
lakkboksen som på mange måter har en egen evne til
å
gjenspeile opplevelsen man har av å gå på
driter'n.
- En
lakkboks er i
likhet med den som er i ferd med å gå på
toalettet
full av godsaker under høyt trykk som bare venter
på
å komme ut.
- Sprayboksen
funker
selv om man ikke rister den på forhånd, men man
oppnår et langt bedre resultat dersom man rister ordentlig
på forhånd for å blande sammen innholdet.
Merk at man
må virkelig riste en del for å oppnå
perfekt resultat
og dette kan sammenlignest med hopping før man går
på toalettet som har en ganske radikal effekt dersom man bare
hopper lengre nok.
- Av
og til hender
det man er så uheldig at drivgassen slipper ut før
lakken,
og dette kan være veldig frustrerende fordi det man vil ha ut
står i røret og er generelt bare til irritasjon.
Det
finnes selvsagt metoder for å få litt
høyere trykk
på drivgassen og det er å klemme på
"magen" til
sprayboksen slik at man øker trykket inni og kanskje klarer
å lure ut noen rester.
- Hvis
man glemmer
å rengjøre dysen på lakkboksen har den
en tendens
til å tette seg og man må ofte gå hardt
til verks med
spesialutstyr eller i nødstilfeller godt gammeldags
håndverk for å åpne dysen for å
klare å
fortsette med det man holdt på med. Dette problemet gjelder
også gammel lakk som har vert lenge lagret og som har en
tendens
til å klumpe seg innvendig i boksen før det skal
ut.
|
Ideas related to the
Universe:
|
The
big bang....
Everyone have probably heard of it and so far this is the best theory
of the origin of the universe. But what was before that? Let's assume
that sometime in the future all the mass of the universe somehow is
gathered in black holes. As time goes by these black holes should
eventually collide and some of them might get bigger. As a few black
holes get bigger and bigger they will consume more and more matter. If
all the matter of the universe is concentrated in black holes there's
no reason to believe that sooner or later (I guess later) the black
holes will merge due to gravity and we might get a superblackhole = a
lump of matter. This might be what we assume started the big bang in
the first place. Most teories says that before the big bang everything
was gathered in a big ball of matter anyway. But this does ofcourse
open for more complexity. Let's say that somewhere there's been more
big bangs. Is it possible that all these big bangs created their own
universe and that the unvierses might collide or merge someday?
Suddenly our unvierse would be larger (twice as large for example).
That would be pretty feaky :)
Most things in the universe are moving away from eachother. Why are
they doing that? What if all atoms will wear and tear and thus the
overall distance of each thing is getting larger. Let's say you have
two balls with a diameter for 10 centimeters. They are floating in
space and are touching eachother. If you shrink each ball the distance
between them will be larger even if the balls are still placed in their
original position. Everything round the ball(s) will be longer away
since the ball is shrinking. If this concept is applyed to the rest of
the planets and objects in the universe they will due to wear and tear
get smaller and the distance will become longer even if the object
itself is still placed at the same location. Perhaps this idea is not
hat stupid after all. If you just zooom in far enought perhaps
everything is just getting smaller since the wear and tear of the atoms
will cause everything to shrink!
I believe that a human beeing can't imagine completely
nothing.
Most people think of darkness when they imagine nothing and so far I'm
pretty sure that as long as humans does not have the capabillity to
imagine nothing I think they will never solve the true riddle of the
universe. What would happen if a human would "see" nothing? would thiis
be what we need to understand the origin of everything?! |
Women, smoke and perfume:
|
| It's a fact that
Women use a lot of money on perfume and other stash that make them
rather delicious. Surprisingly the same women often spends a lot of
money on smoke. How can these individuals be stupid enough to combine
those scents ?!. Does not women who smoke realize that they ruin the
smell of the perfume when they walk around stinking smoke?! Yeah, that
perfume was really worth 70$ per drop. Especially when combined with
that stinking smoke that non-smokers can detect on several meters
distance. Luckily some women are smart enough to have a mint or
something right after smoking, just to bad that it just goes for some and not all ;) |
Basics of artificial intelligence (AI):
|
Everyone thinks that
AI are pretty cool stuff. Many might not like it but it's still a fact
that it's pretty cool stuff. The key to AI as I see it must be
unsynchronized parallelism. Why unsyncronized? well simply because this
helps create randomness who in my view is required for a AI system to
work propperly.
By observing a child for example you can underand a few things about
how we work. A child is always curious about new things. A good example
would be a child that it walking by a wall and is stroking it's hand
against the wall while walking. If there is change like for example a
switch the feel of something unexpected causes the child to stop and
investigate this. If they get a reaction of the switch like a door
opening for example the child might try to push the switch again to see
what happens. If pushing the switch does not reverse the action the
child might physically close the door and then try the switch again.
The idea here is that as long as there is a visible / noticable non
destructive effect you try to reverse it and then duplicate it again if
possible. If this switch made a short beep instead there is no reason
to reverse the effect since that happens automatically (the sound
stops). Behind those very simple examples there are also quite a bit of
randomness involved. You always make a lot of errors even if you don't
carry them out in real life. Ergo you also would require a good error
correction unit that not neccesary makes the correct correction but a
plausible or good enough correction. So to sum this up the basics
required must be:
- Unsyncrhonized parallelism (each with their own error correction units)
- Randomness
- Response to unknown data (combinations).
- The abillity to reverse a process (self learning)
- A "master" error correction unit.
- (Abillity to register self-damage / destructive behaviour for a physical system).
As for the error correcting unit it should be very simple to
demonstrate how well implemented this is in humans. Example is writing
not good like doing now or unexpected while mixing letrtes in wodrs by
sawinppg tehm aorund. Most of you might not even have noticed the
errors in the previous sentence if you was reading this fast. Your
error correction unit did probably put this into some reasonable
context. Even if your version is not 100% exactly what I had in mind it
might be "good enough" or "close enough" for it to be understandable.
Again as you can see it all comes down to understanding the basics by
breaking down things into small pieces we can understand and
relate to - making it "good enough" for us to be acceptable. |
Over
the years I have done
some
thinking and for some reason I have come up with a lot of ideas and
other insane theories. Most of my ideas involve some kind of
improvement on something that exists allready and others are totaly new
inventions of some kind. Some of this ideas is not serious at all
and
will never be but others again can be quite interesting since they in
my oppinion somehow make a good point out of something (at least in
theory). :)